Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Fenix 8: Comparison
Hey there! Today I'm comparing two of Garmin's most advanced multisport watches: the Forerunner 965 and the Fenix 8. Both deliver brilliant AMOLED displays, exceptional GPS accuracy, comprehensive training metrics, and week-long battery life, but they target different athletes with distinct durability levels and feature sets.
I've been testing both watches extensively over the past month, running marathons, tracking ultra-distance workouts, navigating mountain trails, and monitoring recovery metrics daily. In this head-to-head comparison, I'll reveal which premium Garmin watch delivers the best value for your training goals and whether the extra features justify the significant price difference. Let's dive into this battle of Garmin's finest!
Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Fenix 8: Quick Overview
Here's what you need to know upfront: The Garmin Forerunner 965 and Fenix 8 both feature vibrant 1.4-inch AMOLED displays, multi-band GPS, comprehensive training metrics including Training Readiness and HRV status, full-color mapping, and exceptional battery life exceeding two weeks. The Fenix 8 emphasizes ultimate durability with fiber-reinforced polymer case construction, 40-meter dive rating with leakproof inductive buttons, built-in speaker and microphone for calls, upgraded Elevate V5 heart rate sensor, optional solar charging variants, and advanced strength training plans. The Forerunner 965 prioritizes lightweight performance with titanium bezel and plastic case weighing just 53 grams, running-focused features, simpler interface, and significantly lower pricing at $599 versus $999-1,199.
For most athletes, I recommend the Garmin Forerunner 965. Its exceptional tracking accuracy, complete training metrics, lightweight design, and brilliant display handle virtually all multisport needs brilliantly while costing $400-600 less than the Fenix 8. However, choose the Garmin Fenix 8 if you need military-grade durability for extreme adventures, dive computer functionality for scuba activities, voice control and calling features, prefer multiple size options (43mm/47mm/51mm), or want optional solar charging for extended expeditions.
Table of Contents:
- Forerunner 965 vs Fenix 8: Full Comparison
- Fenix 8 vs Forerunner 965: Design
- Forerunner 965 or Fenix 8: Owner Reviews
- Forerunner 965 and Fenix 8 Alternatives
Forerunner 965 vs Fenix 8: Full Comparison
| Specification | Garmin Forerunner 965 | Garmin Fenix 8 |
| Image |
|
|
| Display Type | 1.4" AMOLED | 1.3-1.4" AMOLED or MIP (Solar) |
| Resolution | 454 x 454 pixels | 390 x 390 (43mm), 454 x 454 (47/51mm) |
| Lens Material | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 DX | Gorilla Glass or Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Size Options | 47mm only | 43mm, 47mm, 51mm |
| Case Material | Fiber-reinforced polymer | Fiber-reinforced polymer |
| Bezel Material | Titanium | Stainless steel or Titanium |
| Weight | 53g (without strap) | 60g (43mm), 73g (47mm), 80g (51mm) |
| Water Rating | 5 ATM (50 meters) | 10 ATM, dive-rated to 40m |
| Button Type | Traditional mechanical | Leakproof inductive buttons |
| Heart Rate Sensor | Elevate Gen 4 | Elevate V5 |
| GPS | Multi-band, SatIQ | Multi-band, SatIQ |
| Battery (Smartwatch) | Up to 23 days | Up to 29 days (51mm AMOLED) |
| Battery (GPS Only) | Up to 31 hours | Up to 42 hours (51mm AMOLED) |
| Solar Charging | No | Yes (Solar variants) |
| Speaker & Microphone | No | Yes |
| LED Flashlight | No | Yes |
| Dive Features | No | Scuba & Apnea modes |
| ECG App | No | Yes |
| Voice Commands | No | Yes |
| Storage | 32GB | 32GB |
| Music Playback | Spotify, Amazon, Deezer | Spotify, Amazon, YouTube Music |
| Training Readiness | Yes | Yes |
| HRV Status | Yes | Yes |
| Price | $599 | $999 - $1,199 |
Training metrics reveal functional parity between both watches for core performance tracking. Both deliver Training Readiness scores based on HRV status, recovery time, sleep quality, and training load. Morning Report provides identical daily summaries covering sleep, recovery, training outlook, and personalized workout suggestions. Body Battery energy monitoring, VO2 max estimation, training status, and load metrics function identically. During my marathon testing wearing both watches simultaneously, distance accuracy differed by merely 50 meters over 42 kilometers.
GPS accuracy reaches exceptional levels on both watches thanks to multi-band positioning and SatIQ technology. Multi-band GPS accesses multiple satellite frequency bands simultaneously, dramatically improving accuracy in challenging environments like dense forests or urban canyons. SatIQ intelligently switches between GPS modes based on environmental conditions, balancing accuracy against battery consumption. My testing in heavily wooded trails showed both watches maintaining remarkably accurate tracks with minimal drift, consistently outperforming single-band competitors.
Heart rate sensor technology reveals the Fenix 8's meaningful upgrade. The newer Elevate V5 sensor employs improved algorithms and updated hardware configuration that delivers noticeably better accuracy during high-intensity intervals and strength training. During my HIIT sessions, the Fenix 8 tracked heart rate transitions more smoothly with fewer erroneous spikes compared to the Forerunner 965's Elevate Gen 4 sensor. Both sensors perform admirably during steady-state activities, but the V5's advantages emerge during rapid heart rate changes.
Battery performance favors the Fenix 8's larger variants significantly. The 51mm AMOLED model delivers up to 29 days smartwatch mode versus the Forerunner 965's 23 days, while GPS-only tracking extends to 42 hours compared to 31 hours. The Fenix 8 Solar variants push these numbers dramatically higher, reaching up to 48 days smartwatch mode and 95 hours GPS tracking with solar charging. For ultra-endurance athletes tackling 100-mile races or multi-day expeditions, these battery advantages prove crucial.
Durability specifications separate casual athletes from extreme adventurers. The Forerunner 965's 5 ATM water resistance handles swimming and showering comfortably but excludes high-impact water sports. The Fenix 8's 10 ATM rating and 40-meter dive certification enables scuba diving with full dive computer functionality including depth gauge, dive time tracking, and safety stops. The leakproof inductive buttons eliminate water intrusion points that compromise traditional button designs during submersion.
Smart features distinguish the Fenix 8 as Garmin's most connected sports watch. The built-in speaker and microphone enable Bluetooth calling through paired smartphones, eliminating the need to retrieve your phone during workouts. Voice commands let you start activities, set timers, or activate Do Not Disturb mode hands-free. The LED flashlight provides variable brightness and red light mode for preserving night vision during predawn training or emergency situations. These conveniences accumulate meaningfully for athletes prioritizing connectivity.
Mapping capabilities deliver nearly identical experiences despite minor differences. Both watches feature full-color topographic maps with turn-by-turn navigation, ClimbPro for analyzing upcoming elevation changes, and round-trip routing based on distance. The Fenix 8 adds preloaded ski resort maps and enhanced tide information useful for specific activities, but these niche features rarely impact most athletes. The shared 1.4-inch AMOLED displays render maps beautifully with excellent outdoor visibility.
Weight differences impact comfort during extended wear significantly. The Forerunner 965's featherweight 53-gram design (without strap) disappears on the wrist during sleep tracking and all-day wear. The Fenix 8's heavier construction ranges from 60 grams (43mm) to 80 grams (51mm), creating noticeable presence especially during sleep. For runners prioritizing ultimate lightness, those 20-27 extra grams matter during marathons and ultras when every ounce counts.
Fenix 8 vs Forerunner 965: Design & Build
Both watches embrace Garmin's established sports watch aesthetics while targeting different durability priorities - one maximizes lightness, the other emphasizes ruggedness.
Garmin Forerunner 965 Design:
Garmin Fenix 8 Design:
The Forerunner 965 achieves remarkable lightness through its polymer case paired with titanium bezel. The 47mm case measures 47.2 x 47.2 x 13.2mm with a weight that feels almost negligible during extended wear. Traditional mechanical buttons provide tactile feedback with satisfying clicks. The Corning Gorilla Glass 3 DX lens resists scratches adequately for most activities. Available in colorful combinations including Amp Yellow and Whitestone, the Forerunner embraces athletic aesthetics unabashedly.
The Fenix 8 prioritizes military-grade durability with its fiber-reinforced polymer case and stainless steel or titanium bezel options. Available in three sizes accommodating different wrist sizes, the watch feels substantially more robust. The leakproof inductive buttons eliminate mechanical parts that could fail under extreme conditions, though they sacrifice some tactile feedback. Sapphire crystal options provide superior scratch resistance for outdoor adventures. The integrated LED flashlight and sensor guard protecting microphone and barometer demonstrate thoughtful engineering for harsh environments.
Forerunner 965 or Fenix 8: Owner Reviews
Real-world feedback from actual users reveals how these premium sports watches perform across diverse training scenarios:
Garmin Forerunner 965 Owner Reviews:
Praises: "The AMOLED display is absolutely stunning - such a massive upgrade from my old Forerunner 945. Maps are crisp and readable even in direct sunlight, and the interface feels incredibly responsive."
"So lightweight I forget I'm wearing it during sleep tracking. The titanium bezel looks premium while the plastic case keeps the weight down perfectly. Battery easily lasts 10-12 days with daily runs."
***
Drawbacks: "Lacks the flashlight that newer Garmin watches have, which would be incredibly useful for early morning runs. Also no speaker for taking calls like the Fenix 8."
"The plastic case scratches more easily than I expected. Nothing major but after 6 months of use, there are visible wear marks around the edges."
Garmin Fenix 8 Owner Reviews:
Praises: "The build quality is absolutely tank-like - this watch could survive a nuclear apocalypse. The leakproof buttons and 40m dive rating mean I genuinely don't worry about water damage anymore."
"Voice commands and the speaker are game-changers. Being able to start activities hands-free while setting up gear or take quick calls without pulling out my phone during workouts is incredibly convenient."
***
Drawbacks: "The 51mm version is noticeably heavier than my old Forerunner 965. Not uncomfortable, but definitely more presence on the wrist, especially during sleep tracking."
"Hard to justify the $1,000+ price when the Forerunner 965 delivers 95% of the functionality for $400 less. The extra features are nice but feel like overkill for most runners."
Forerunner 965 and Fenix 8 Alternatives
If neither Garmin watch perfectly matches your requirements, these compelling alternatives warrant consideration:
- Garmin Forerunner 265: More affordable AMOLED option with 1.3-inch display, similar training metrics, lighter 47-gram weight, and $449 pricing. Compromises include smaller display, no maps, and reduced battery life to 13 days smartwatch mode.
- COROS PACE Pro: Strong value alternative with AMOLED display, excellent GPS accuracy, 20-day battery life, and $349 pricing. Trade-offs include less mature software ecosystem and fewer third-party app integrations compared to Garmin Connect.
The Forerunner 265 appeals to runners wanting AMOLED quality without mapping or premium pricing. The smaller 42mm form factor suits petite wrists better while maintaining core training metrics including Training Readiness, HRV status, and race predictor widgets. The $150 savings over the 965 funds accessories or race entries. However, the smaller display and absent maps limit navigation capabilities for trail runners and adventure athletes.
The COROS PACE Pro delivers exceptional value through its bright AMOLED display and industry-leading GPS accuracy at half the Fenix 8's cost. The digital dial crown provides unique navigation compared to Garmin's button interface. Training metrics prove comprehensive though presented differently than Garmin's ecosystem. The lighter weight and lower price make it compelling for budget-conscious athletes accepting a less mature app ecosystem.
Should You Buy the Forerunner 965 or Fenix 8?
After extensive real-world testing across marathons, trail runs, strength training, and daily wear, both watches deliver exceptional athletic performance justifying their premium positions in Garmin's lineup.
Choose the Forerunner 965 if you're a serious runner, triathlete, or multisport athlete who prioritizes lightweight comfort, proven training metrics, and excellent value. The brilliant AMOLED display, exceptional GPS accuracy, comprehensive performance tracking, and featherweight design deliver everything most athletes need. The $599 price represents the sweet spot between features and affordability while the titanium bezel adds premium aesthetics. For dedicated runners logging high mileage who don't need dive computer functionality or voice features, this remains Garmin's best overall sports watch value.
Choose the Fenix 8 if you're an adventure athlete requiring military-grade durability, dive computer functionality, or the absolute latest technology. The 40-meter dive rating with scuba modes serves underwater enthusiasts, while voice commands and Bluetooth calling convenience appeals to connected athletes. Multiple size options accommodate different wrist sizes, and optional solar charging extends battery life dramatically for expedition-length adventures. The upgraded Elevate V5 heart rate sensor delivers measurably better accuracy during high-intensity training.
The Forerunner 965 represents the smarter choice for most athletes through its exceptional feature-to-price ratio. However, the Fenix 8 justifies its premium pricing for specialized athletes needing its unique capabilities or those simply wanting Garmin's absolute best regardless of cost. Both watches deliver outstanding training experiences - your choice depends on whether you prioritize lightweight value or ultimate versatility with advanced features.
Go Deeper: