Best Phones for Photography Under $600

The $600 ceiling on smartphones used to mean settling for compressed dynamic range, mediocre night modes, and sensors that turned your subject into a watercolor painting the moment a cloud passed over the sun. That gap has narrowed considerably. The five phones I've been testing for this roundup all land under $600, and every one of them can produce a night shot that would have embarrassed a phone twice its price two years ago.

What separates a genuinely capable camera phone from one that just sounds capable on a spec sheet comes down to image processing consistency - how the phone handles tricky mixed-light scenes, how well it recovers shadow detail without blowing highlights, and how far its zoom holds up when there's no tripod involved. I tested each of these phones over several weeks, shooting in conditions ranging from bright midday sun to dimly lit restaurant interiors, and the differences between them are real and worth understanding before you buy.

If you're in a hurry, here are my top two picks for best phones for photography under $600:

Table of Contents:

• Best Phones for Photography Under $600: Buying Guide
• Top 5 Camera Phones Under $600 in 2026
• Camera Phones Under $600 Comparison
• Google Pixel 8a
• Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
• OnePlus 12R
• Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
• Motorola Edge 2024
• Best Camera Phones Under $600: FAQ

Best Phones for Photography Under $600: Buying Guide

Main Camera Sensor Size and Aperture

The sensor inside a smartphone camera determines how much light it captures before any processing begins. A larger sensor collects more photons per exposure, which translates directly to better low-light performance and smoother dynamic range transitions. Every phone in this group uses a sensor at or above 1/1.56 inches for its main camera - the threshold where real differences in shadow recovery start to show up in real-world shots rather than just on spec sheets.

Aperture determines the diameter of the lens opening and, combined with sensor size, sets the physical light-gathering capability of a camera system. A wider aperture (lower f-number) lets in more light but also reduces depth of field - useful for portrait subject separation, but potentially a disadvantage in landscape shots where edge-to-edge sharpness is the goal.

Aperture matters, but it rarely tells the whole story in mobile photography. I've found that the combination of sensor size, pixel binning implementation, and how each phone handles noise reduction under low light separates truly capable cameras from ones that merely look impressive in ideal conditions. The f/1.8 apertures common across this group are functionally equivalent until you see how each manufacturer's processing stack handles an interior shot under mixed fluorescent and window light - which is exactly where the differences become obvious.

Zoom Range and Telephoto Implementation

A dedicated telephoto lens is the feature most of these phones have to compromise on at the $600 price point. Only two of the five include a real optical zoom camera, and that hardware gap matters enormously once you shoot past 2x. My first test with any mid-range phone is always a side-by-side 3x digital crop comparison against a phone with real telephoto glass, because the loss of detail and the over-sharpened edge texture in digital zoom is immediately visible in that test - no pixel-peeping required.

The distinction becomes clearest when photographing subjects at a distance in mixed or low light. Periscope telephoto systems, which use a prism to fold the light path and allow a longer focal length in a thin body, are now appearing in mid-range phones, and one of the models tested here includes one. For anyone who regularly photographs architecture, wildlife, events, or portraits from across a room, the presence or absence of a true telephoto camera is the single most significant hardware difference in this price range.

Image Processing and AI Photography Features

Camera hardware is only half the equation. Computational photography - how the phone processes raw sensor data - often makes a bigger practical difference than specs alone. Google's approach, built around its Tensor chip and years of dedicated research, produces a different kind of image than Samsung's color-tuned pipeline, even when both phones start with similar hardware. The best implementations apply multi-frame stacking, scene recognition, and real-time HDR compositing faster than the eye can detect, and produce results that look natural rather than processed.

AI-based image processing in modern smartphones includes scene recognition, multi-frame stacking for noise reduction, and real-time HDR compositing. The tradeoff is processing time: phones that run more frames through their neural engine before producing a final JPEG tend to introduce more latency between pressing the shutter and capturing the next shot - which matters when photographing children, animals, or any fast-moving subject.

The best AI camera tools in this price range address things no hardware upgrade can fix: blurry group photos, missed expressions, or a great composition ruined by a photobomber in the background. Google's Magic Eraser, Best Take, and Photo Unblur are genuinely useful for photographers who miss these details in the moment. Samsung's Galaxy AI tools take a similar approach with different aesthetic goals - its processing tends to push saturation and sharpening further, producing images that look striking on the phone's own display but are occasionally less faithful to what the scene actually looked like.

Video Performance and Stabilization

All five phones here shoot 4K video, but the quality of that footage and how stable it looks under handheld conditions varies more than the shared resolution suggests. Optical image stabilization at the hardware level produces measurably better results than electronic stabilization alone, especially during movement or at elevated zoom levels. Three of the five phones in this group include OIS on the main camera, and two of those also carry OIS on their telephoto cameras - which is where the difference between usable and unusable handheld footage at zoom becomes apparent.

What I pay attention to when evaluating video in this price tier is how the phone handles moving subject autofocus during a tracking shot. Some mid-range processors still struggle with keeping a moving subject in crisp focus while simultaneously managing exposure transitions, particularly when panning from shade into direct sun. The best performers here maintain exposure consistency and autofocus accuracy even while moving, which is exactly the kind of shot that reveals processing quality under real-world pressure rather than controlled test conditions.

Build Quality, Water Resistance, and Long-Term Value

A camera phone you won't take out in the rain is one you'll only use half the time. IP68 certification covers submersion in up to 1.5 meters of fresh water for 30 minutes, which handles most realistic accidents and outdoor weather conditions. Three of the five phones here carry IP68, one carries IP67, and one is rated IP54 - meaning only splash protection in specific directions. For photographers who regularly shoot near water, in rain, or at the beach, the water resistance tier is a practical camera spec, not just a hardware checkbox.

IP ratings describe laboratory test conditions, not the upper limit of survival. Saltwater, soap, and particulates from mud or sand can degrade port seals and screen adhesive faster than fresh-water testing implies. Keeping charging ports dry and checking for seal damage after any hard impact extends effective water resistance well beyond the rated period - regardless of the certification number on the box.

My experience is that a phone you want to carry is the phone you'll have with you when something worth photographing happens. Weight and ergonomics affect how often the camera actually gets used over the course of a day out. Software update commitments matter more for a camera phone than for most devices, because AI photography features improve with software generations - a phone that stops receiving updates in three years will fall behind the computational photography capabilities of its contemporaries faster than the hardware would suggest. Google and Samsung's seven-year update commitments are a meaningful long-term advantage here.

Top 5 Camera Phones Under $600 in 2026

These phones were tested across several weeks of real-world photography - including street shooting, indoor portraits, low-light restaurant interiors, and outdoor landscape work - to identify which models actually perform rather than just spec impressively on paper.

Camera Phones Under $600 Comparison

Here is a detailed comparison of the camera and hardware specifications that matter most when choosing a photography-focused phone under $600:

From my testing, the specs that translate most directly into better real-world photography are telephoto implementation, main sensor processing quality, and how consistently each camera handles scenes you didn't plan around.

Google Pixel 8a Review

Editor's Choice

I keep the Pixel 8a as my reference point when evaluating mid-range camera phones because Google's image processing sets the standard for what software can do with relatively modest hardware. The main camera uses a 64MP Sony IMX787 sensor behind an f/1.9 lens with OIS, binning down to 16MP for standard shots. What that produces in practice is photography that holds up in difficult conditions - mixed-light interiors, backlit portraits, and night scenes - with a consistency that most phones at this price can't match, regardless of how impressive their sensor specs sound.

The Tensor G3 chip runs Google's computational photography stack, including Best Take for selecting the sharpest expression from a burst, Magic Eraser for removing unwanted background elements, Photo Unblur for recovering slightly soft frames, and Audio Magic Eraser for video cleanup. Night Sight remains one of the best night mode implementations in Android - not because of particularly fast processing, but because the output looks natural rather than artificially brightened and over-sharpened. A 120Hz OLED panel at 1080x2400 with 430 PPI and 2000-nit peak brightness keeps images sharp and vivid when reviewing shots in direct sunlight.

There are genuine trade-offs. The 18W wired charging is the slowest in this group by a significant margin, and the 7.5W wireless charging barely qualifies as fast by current standards. No telephoto camera means zoom past 2x relies on a digital crop from the main sensor, and while Google's Super Res Zoom produces cleaner results than most digital zoom implementations, it can't replicate the sharpness of dedicated glass. The 13MP ultrawide's fixed focus means close-up ultrawide compositions occasionally lack the crispness the main sensor would produce at the same distance.

The 6.1-inch form factor is a real point of difference in this comparison. At 188g it's among the lighter options, and the smaller footprint makes one-handed shooting more natural over a full day out. The IP67 rating handles rain and accidental splashes comfortably. Seven years of guaranteed software updates from Google is the longest commitment in this roundup, and for a phone you intend to use as a daily camera for several years, that matters more than it might seem at the point of purchase - computational photography features improve with every major software release.

The Pixel 8a is the right pick for photographers who want accurate, natural-looking images produced consistently rather than just occasionally. Its processing advantage over hardware-equivalent competitors is real and shows most clearly in the situations that matter - when the light isn't cooperating and you don't have time to frame the perfect shot.

Summary: Google Pixel 8a leads this roundup for consistent camera processing and long-term software value, with best-in-class AI editing tools and natural-output photography in a compact 188g build. The right choice for photographers who want reliable results across every lighting condition.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Review

Best Overall

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the only phone in this group with a proper triple-camera setup that includes a real 3x optical telephoto, and that hardware advantage is immediately apparent once you need it. The main 50MP ISOCELL GN3 sensor appears in the Galaxy S22, S23, and S24 as well - Samsung's familiarity with its characteristics shows in consistent exposure and reliable autofocus across varying conditions. In PhoneArena's camera scoring, the S24 FE matched the Pixel 9 in still image testing and beat it outright in video, which tells you something about how much camera Samsung packed into its fan edition.

The 8MP 3x telephoto with PDAF and OIS is the decisive hardware advantage over every other phone in this price range. Portrait shots at 70mm equivalent show subject separation and edge detection quality that no digital crop from a main sensor can match. I've tested the 3x zoom in dim restaurant light and the OIS does genuine work there - shots that would come out blurry at 1/30 second handheld stay acceptably sharp. The 12MP ultrawide is a step up from the 10MP unit on the S23 FE and handles dynamic range well, though fine detail in foliage and textured surfaces trails the main camera.

Samsung's Galaxy AI adds Generative Edit, Portrait Studio, and AI-enhanced Nightography to the camera experience. The processing philosophy differs from Google's: Samsung pushes saturation and microcontrast harder, producing images that pop immediately on the phone's own 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display and look striking at a glance on social media. Whether that matches how scenes actually looked is a matter of taste - some photographers prefer the vibrancy, others find it pushed too far for documentary or travel work. Both Pro mode and RAW capture are available for photographers who want full control.

The 4700mAh battery handles a full day of heavy camera use without anxiety, and 15W wireless charging makes overnight top-ups practical. IP68 certification is the most complete water protection in this group along with the Motorola Edge 2024. At roughly 223g, the S24 FE is the heaviest phone tested here, and the 6.7-inch footprint requires adjustment for one-handed shooting and pocket carry. Samsung matches Google's seven-year software update commitment, which is meaningful for any phone you intend to use as a camera system beyond the three-year mark.

If I were recommending a single phone to someone who regularly photographs a mix of landscapes, portraits, and events and doesn't want to think about hardware limitations in the moment, the S24 FE covers all three scenarios with real optical glass rather than digital workarounds. The 3x telephoto alone justifies its position as the most versatile camera system in this group.

Summary: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE packs the only proper 3x optical telephoto in this comparison into a Galaxy AI-equipped package with IP68 protection and a 6.7-inch flagship-grade display. The best-rounded camera phone here for photographers who want full zoom versatility.

OnePlus 12R Review

Battery King

What OnePlus does with the 12R is take a flagship-tier processor - specifically the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, the same chip found in 2023's top-tier Android phones - and put it in a phone that sits well under the flagship price. The camera benefits from that processing power in a way that a Snapdragon 7-series chip cannot match: the camera app opens instantly, shutter response is close to zero lag, and the ability to process a burst of frames without visible slowdown makes this the fastest camera-in-hand experience in the group.

The main camera uses a Sony IMX890 sensor with a 1/1.56-inch size and f/1.8 aperture with OIS. Daylight results are excellent - sharp, well-saturated without artificiality, and with dynamic range that keeps both highlights and shadow detail intact in high-contrast scenes. GSMArena's side-by-side testing found 12R daylight shots difficult to distinguish from those of the full OnePlus 12, which costs significantly more. Low-light performance is better than the sensor specs suggest, with the phone's auto-night mode activating reliably and producing exposures that look natural rather than pulled-up from underexposure.

The zoom story is the main limitation. No dedicated telephoto camera means anything past 2x relies on a digital crop from the IMX890, and the results degrade noticeably in fine detail by 5x. The 8MP ultrawide uses a small 1/4-inch sensor, which shows clearly in side-by-side detail comparisons with the 12MP and 13MP ultrawides on other phones in this group. OnePlus also included a 2MP macro camera that adds nothing of practical value - a choice that should have gone toward a better ultrawide sensor instead.

Battery life is where the 12R earns its badge unambiguously. The 5500mAh cell, backed by 80W SUPERVOOC charging that fills the phone in approximately 30 minutes from flat, makes battery anxiety disappear for most users. I can do a full day of heavy photography - dozens of shots, video clips, and GPS navigation running in the background - and still have 30% capacity at the end of the day. The 6.78-inch ProXDR AMOLED with a 4500-nit peak and HDR10+ support also shows camera output at its absolute best when reviewing shots.

No wireless charging is a notable omission at this price, and the IP64 rating is the least protective in this group - manageable in rain but not in shallow submersion. For photographers who prioritize speed, battery endurance, and main-camera quality and predominantly shoot with the primary lens, the 12R is a strong and well-priced performer. For anyone who needs real zoom reach, it isn't the right choice.

Summary: OnePlus 12R pairs flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance with a capable Sony main camera and the fastest charging speed in this group. The right pick for photographers who value day-long battery endurance and camera responsiveness over zoom versatility.

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Review

Zoom Specialist

Nothing's approach to the 3a Pro starts with something unusual for a phone at this price: a genuine periscope telephoto camera. The 50MP Sony LYTIA 600 sensor behind a 3x optical zoom lens - equivalent to 70mm - uses a prism to fold the optical path and deliver a physically longer focal length without a camera module that makes the phone unwieldy to carry. OIS on the telephoto adds real handheld stability at 3x, and Nothing's TrueLens Engine 3.0 AI processing maintains color matching between the telephoto and main camera well enough that switching between focal lengths doesn't produce an obvious tonal shift.

The main camera uses a 50MP Samsung ISOCELL GNJ sensor in a 1/1.56-inch format with f/1.88 aperture and OIS. GSMArena's testing found the 12.5MP binned standard shots to carry excellent detail and low noise with well-balanced dynamic range. What stood out to me in testing was motion capture performance in favorable lighting - shooting kids and animals, the phone's autofocus held focus on moving subjects more reliably than I expected given the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip. Portrait mode results show natural skin tone rendering with convincing background blur at both 1x and 2x zoom positions.

The 8MP ultrawide uses a Sony IMX355 sensor with a 120-degree field of view and fixed focus. It handles scene-setting wide shots and environmental context photography well, but falls behind the main and telephoto cameras in resolving fine textures, and there's no autofocus for close-up wide compositions. The 50MP front camera is the highest-resolution selfie camera in this comparison - 4K video recording from the front is a genuine differentiator for content creators and video callers who want front-camera quality on par with the rear.

The phone runs Android 15 on Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 with 12GB RAM, and NothingOS is genuinely one of the cleaner mid-range Android interfaces. The Essential Space AI assistant and its dedicated physical button on the side are interesting additions to the camera experience - the button makes activating voice memos or logging photo context fast without unlocking the phone. The 5000mAh battery with 50W wired charging handles full shooting days without a midday charge.

The IP54 rating is the most limited water protection in this group - fine for light rain, but not for poolside use. There is no wireless charging. US buyers face more limited official warranty and service infrastructure compared to the UK and Indian markets, which is worth factoring into a purchase decision if post-sale support matters to you. For zoom versatility and selfie resolution at this price, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro has no direct competition in this comparison.

Summary: Nothing Phone (3a) Pro brings a genuine periscope 3x telephoto and a 50MP front camera to the mid-range price point, backed by clean software and strong main camera AI processing. The clearest choice for photographers who prioritize zoom reach and selfie quality.

Motorola Edge 2024 Review

Style Pick

The Motorola Edge 2024 is the lightest phone in this comparison at 174g, and that isn't a coincidence - Motorola made deliberate choices around materials and proportions to keep it there. The vegan leather back avoids the weight and fragility of glass while adding grip texture that makes the phone far more confident to hold without a case, and the symmetrically curved pOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate gives the phone a premium feel that's unusual at this price. For photographers who want a phone that disappears into a shirt pocket between shots and doesn't fatigue the hand during a long afternoon of street shooting, the Edge 2024 is the answer.

The camera centers on a 50MP Sony LYT-700C sensor at 1/1.5 inches - the largest main sensor in this group on paper - behind an f/1.8 lens with OIS. Motorola's outdoor daylight shots are good, with solid contrast and color that's less oversaturated than Samsung's typical output. The 13MP ultrawide is where the Edge 2024 makes a practical argument: autofocus on an ultrawide means close-up compositions - food, flat-lay product photos, architectural details at close range - stay sharp rather than going soft the way fixed-focus ultrawides do. That's a capability none of the other phones here offer on their ultrawide lens.

The processing inconsistency in low and indoor light is the main camera complaint in this group. Shots of moving subjects indoors frequently come out blurred at shutter speeds where other phones produce clean results, and Motorola's edge-sharpening during processing can flatten fine detail in textured subjects, giving photos a slightly artificial quality on close inspection. The 32MP front camera with autofocus is the second-highest selfie resolution here and handles a range of distances naturally - a strong point for video calls and self-portraits at arm's length.

At 68W, TurboPower charging is the second-fastest in this group, and 15W wireless charging is a convenience the OnePlus 12R and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro can't offer. IP68 waterproofing is full protection alongside the Samsung. The 5000mAh battery keeps the phone running through a full day of photography without midday anxiety. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is noticeably slower in camera processing speed than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus 12R - switching lenses and processing HDR shots takes a beat longer, which shows up when shooting fast-changing scenes.

The Edge 2024 is built for someone who wants a light, elegant phone with a capable main camera for everyday photography, values physical comfort over zoom reach, and wants full water protection in a body that doesn't feel like a brick. Motorola's three-year update timeline is the main long-term concern relative to the seven-year commitments from Google and Samsung.

Summary: Motorola Edge 2024 is the lightest and slimmest option in this group, combining a capable main sensor, autofocus ultrawide, and IP68 protection in a 174g build with fast charging. The best choice for photographers who want a carry-anywhere phone that doesn't compromise on build quality.

Best Camera Phones Under $600: FAQ

Does Google's Tensor chip actually make a camera difference compared to Snapdragon?

Yes, but not in the way chip comparisons usually work. The Tensor G3 is not faster than Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in raw compute benchmarks - in fact, it's generally slower. What it does differently is run Google's proprietary computational photography algorithms on dedicated neural processing hardware. That means the specific image processing pipeline Google has refined over years runs more efficiently on Tensor than it would on a Snapdragon chip. The result is Night Sight, Best Take, and Super Res Zoom implementations that produce results no Snapdragon-based phone at this price matches in consistent real-world output.

Is a 3x optical telephoto worth the trade-offs in a mid-range phone?

It depends on what you photograph. For portraits, events, architecture, and anything where your subject is more than five meters away, a real 3x optical camera produces results that digital zoom cannot approximate. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro both include one, and the quality difference is visible in almost every telephoto-range shot. The trade-off is that both phones had to reduce the ultrawide sensor to fit the telephoto into the budget, so if you shoot wide more often than you shoot telephoto, the calculus shifts toward a phone with a stronger ultrawide.

Why do some phones here only get 3 years of software updates?

Google and Samsung have both committed to 7 years of Android and security updates for their recent devices, while Motorola, OnePlus, and Nothing currently commit to 3 years of major Android versions. That gap is significant if you plan to keep your phone for more than a few years, and security updates matter for a device that holds your photos and financial applications. Computational photography features also improve with major Android updates, meaning a phone that stops receiving them in 2027 will lag behind its contemporaries in camera capability faster than the hardware would suggest. For buyers who upgrade frequently, the gap matters less.

How much does sensor size actually matter in a smartphone camera?

At the main camera level, the phones here are all within a range where real-world differences are subtle in good light. The meaningful differences emerge in low light, where a larger sensor collecting more photons per frame translates to cleaner shadow detail and less noise amplification. For ultrawide cameras, the differences are more significant because smaller sensors with lower resolution show up clearly in textured subjects and fine background detail. In my testing, I found that processing quality ultimately determines whether a hardware sensor advantage translates to better output - the Pixel 8a's smaller-spec sensor consistently outperforms larger-sensor phones in difficult light because Google's processing is better.

Can any of these phones replace a dedicated camera for travel photography?

All five can cover the travel photography use cases most people actually need: landscape wide shots, street portraits, architectural details, and low-light interiors. None replaces a camera with a long telephoto for wildlife or sports at distance. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE comes closest to a travel-camera replacement because its 3x optical zoom covers the range from 24mm to 72mm equivalent in real optical glass, which handles the majority of travel shooting scenarios. The Google Pixel 8a's processing consistency makes it the most reliable choice for mixed-condition travel days when you can't predict the light or control the scene.

What is the practical difference between IP67 and IP68?

IP67 certifies protection against submersion in up to 1 meter of fresh water for 30 minutes. IP68 typically covers submersion in up to 1.5 meters for the same duration. For most real-world scenarios - rain, splashes, brief drops in shallow water - both ratings offer equivalent protection. The meaningful gap only appears in deeper accidental submersions. The Pixel 8a's IP67 rating handles everything except a deliberate deep-water drop, while the Samsung and Motorola IP68-rated phones add a small margin of safety. IP54 on the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro only certifies splash protection in specific directions, which requires noticeably more care in wet conditions.

Why does the Motorola Edge 2024's ultrawide have autofocus when others don't?

Most ultrawide cameras use fixed focus because the wide field of view creates a naturally deep depth of field - most subjects within normal photography distances appear sharp anyway. Motorola included autofocus on its ultrawide to enable close-up wide-angle work: food photography, flat-lay product shots, and architectural details at short distances stay sharp where a fixed-focus ultrawide would go soft. In my testing, I found it genuinely useful when photographing textured surfaces and table-top scenes at close range. None of the other phones in this comparison offer that capability on their ultrawide lens, and for certain shooting styles, it's a meaningful practical advantage.

Is video quality comparable to photo quality on these phones?

Mostly, but with exceptions worth knowing. The OnePlus 12R and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE both shoot 4K at 60fps from the main camera, which handles fast-motion content more cleanly than the 4K@30fps ceiling on the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and Motorola Edge 2024. Google's video processing on the Pixel 8a is typically more color-accurate than the competition, and its Audio Magic Eraser feature for cleaning up background noise in video has no equivalent in this group. In my testing, the OnePlus 12R produced the smoothest handheld walking footage thanks to its fast processor managing stabilization in real time, while the Pixel 8a produced the most natural-looking color grading without any post-processing adjustment.

Choosing the Right Camera Phone Under $600

The five phones in this group cover meaningfully different photography priorities, and the right choice depends on what you actually shoot and how long you plan to use the phone.

For the best balance of consistent processing quality and long-term software value, the Google Pixel 8a is where I start the recommendation. Its output in challenging light is the most reliable in this group, and seven years of guaranteed updates makes it a sound long-term investment. Photographers who need real zoom reach and full camera versatility across all scenarios should look at the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, the only phone here with a proper three-lens hardware stack and 3x optical glass.

For buyers who prioritize performance and battery endurance over zoom versatility, the OnePlus 12R brings flagship-chip speed and 80W charging in a camera-capable package that's hard to beat at its price point. Those who want the best zoom reach in a phone under $500 should look at the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro - its periscope telephoto has no competition in this tier and makes a genuine difference for portrait and event photographers. For anyone who wants the lightest, most pocketable option in the group with full IP68 protection, the Motorola Edge 2024 fits anywhere and survives any weather.