GRID M60 8Q vs Tesla C2050

When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID M60 8Q

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GRID M60 8Q	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID M60 8Q.
GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID M60 8Q has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 17 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID M60 8Q is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
QHD / 1440p	10−12	8−9
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M60 8Q and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	220−230
medium / 768p	200−210	190−200
ultra / 1080p	110−120	110−120
QHD / 1440p	85−90	70−75
4K / 2160p	45−50	35−40
high / 768p	160−170	150−160
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	75−80	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	30−35
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	10−12
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
medium / 768p	90−95	85−90
high / 1080p	40−45	35−40
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	6−7	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	70−75	65−70
medium / 768p	45−50	40−45
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	GRID M60 8Q	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GM204	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 August 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	2048	448
Core clock speed	557 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1178 MHz
Transistor count	5,200 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	150.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	4,833 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

GRID M60 8Q vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares