Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GH will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro T1000

Radeon RX Vega M GH Check Price

Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:

Radeon RX Vega M GH Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro T1000	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type		HBM2
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

Radeon RX Vega M GH has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 332 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6400 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	10−11	10−11
low / 720p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	40−45	40−45
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	35−40	35−40
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	60−65	60−65
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	220−230	220−230
ultra / 1080p	180−190	180−190
QHD / 1440p	110−120	110−120
4K / 2160p	70−75	70−75
high / 768p	210−220	210−220
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	80−85	80−85
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
low / 720p	180−190	180−190
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	30−35	30−35
4K / 2160p	24−27	24−27
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	65−70	65−70
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	140−150	140−150
medium / 768p	120−130	120−130
high / 1080p	70−75	70−75
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
QHD / 1440p	21−24	21−24
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
low / 720p	65−70	65−70
medium / 1080p	30−35	30−35
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	130−140	130−140
medium / 1080p	120−130	120−130
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
low / 720p	65−70	65−70
medium / 1080p	35−40	35−40
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	130−140	130−140
medium / 768p	85−90	85−90
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	24−27
4K / 2160p	16−18	16−18
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	50−55
high / 768p	60−65	60−65
Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	Quadro T1000	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Architecture	Turing	Vega
Code name	TU117	Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019	7 January 2018
Pipelines		1536
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1063 MHz
Boost Clock	1455 MHz	1190 MHz
Transistor count	4,700 million	5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate		114.2
Floating-point performance		3,656 gflops
Memory bus width		1024 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth		204.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model		6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan		1.2.131
Laptop size		medium sized
		Check Price

Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares