GRID M60 8Q vs Tesla C2050
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 17 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 8Q is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |