Radeon R9 370 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon R9 370 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 370 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
Radeon R9 370 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 116% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 370.
- Radeon R9 370 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 370 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 351 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla C2050 is 27 mm longer, than Radeon R9 370.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 2600 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R9 370 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon R9 370 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 370 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Trinidad | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |