FireStream 9250 vs Tesla C2070

When comparing FireStream 9250 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9250

Tesla C2070

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI

Tesla C2070 has 58% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 51 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1002 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	5−6	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	55−60
medium / 1080p	7−8	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	95−100	180−190
ultra / 1080p	45−50	100−110
QHD / 1440p	35−40	60−65
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−35
high / 768p	70−75	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	3−4	20−22
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 340% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 170% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	8−9	27−30
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	20−22	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−11	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	8−9	30−35
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	7−8	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	7−8	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	16−18	60−65
medium / 768p	12−14	35−40
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	Tesla C2070
Architecture	TeraScale	Fermi
Code name	RV770	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	25 July 2011
Pipelines	800	448
Core clock speed	625 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	143.4 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0

FireStream 9250 vs Tesla C2070

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares