GRID K140Q vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 83% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1206 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 440% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K140Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 277% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |