GRID K140Q vs Tesla M10
When comparing GRID K140Q and Tesla M10, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Tesla M10 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Tesla M10
Main Specs
GRID K140Q | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Tesla M10 has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 183 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3418 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 571% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K140Q | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK107 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |