Tesla C2050 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Tesla C2050 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Tesla C2050 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| Tesla C2050 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 3 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Tesla C2050 and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Tesla C2050 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 248 mm.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 132 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla C2050 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF100 | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |