FirePro M4000 vs FirePro R5000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and FirePro R5000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and FirePro R5000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro M4000 Check Price

FirePro R5000 Check Price

FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:

FirePro M4000 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4000	FirePro R5000
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	350 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro R5000 has 960% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro R5000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro R5000 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro R5000 - in Desktops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro R5000 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 225 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 and FirePro R5000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 1300 MHz higher, than FirePro R5000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4000 and FirePro R5000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	190−200
medium / 768p	120−130	160−170
ultra / 1080p	55−60	90−95
QHD / 1440p	30−35	50−55
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	90−95	130−140
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	65−70	85−90
ultra / 1080p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	9−10	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	90−95
medium / 1080p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Fortnite is 41% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
medium / 768p	50−55	70−75
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	5−6	8−9
ultra / 1080p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	24−27
medium / 1080p	7−8	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	27−30	45−50
medium / 768p	18−20	30−33
high / 1080p	10−11	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−35
high / 768p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than FirePro M4000.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4000	FirePro R5000
Architecture	GCN	GCN 1.0
Code name	Cape Verde GLM	Pitcairn
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 July 2012	25 February 2013
Pipelines	512	768
Core clock speed	600 MHz	825 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60	39.60
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	1,267 gflops
Length		279 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	102.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bus support	n/a	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	79 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Form factor	MXM-A	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M4000 vs FirePro R5000

FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares