FirePro M4000 vs FireStream 9270
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and FireStream 9270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 384% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9270 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 900 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 32% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 13 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 30.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |