FirePro M4000 vs FireStream 9370
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and FireStream 9370, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and FireStream 9370.
FireStream 9370
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | FireStream 9370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 581% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 225 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4000 and FireStream 9370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 38% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | FireStream 9370 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Cypress |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 23 June 2010 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 66.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |