FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GT 545
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GT 545 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 545 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 545
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GT 545 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 545 has 112% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GT 545 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 545 has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GT 545 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GT 545 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 545 is 120 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 545 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2900 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 545.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 55% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GT 545 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GF116 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 14 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 17.28 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 35 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |