FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 384% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 179 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 492 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GF114 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 779 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |