FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 670M
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 670M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
GeForce GTX 670M
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670M has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
150−160
medium / 768p
120−130
120−130
ultra / 1080p
55−60
60−65
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−11
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
27−30
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 1% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
30−33
medium / 768p
18−20
18−20
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
GeForce GTX 670M
Architecture
GCN
Fermi
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
N13E-GS1-LP
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
22 March 2012
Pipelines
512
336
Core clock speed
600 MHz
598 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
33.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
803.7 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
192bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
72.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
n/a
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
53 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price