FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 850A
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 850A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 850A.
GeForce GTX 850A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 36% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 302 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 850A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 37.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |