FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 950A
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 950A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 950A.
GeForce GTX 950A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 950A uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 950A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 950A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 950A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 393 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 950A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 950A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 35% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 20% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 44.96 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 32.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K3000M
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K2000D
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K3000M
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K2000D
- FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 M470
- FirePro M4000 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU