FirePro M4000 vs GRID K220Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and GRID K220Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against GRID K220Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K220Q
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 581% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 145 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 75% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |