FirePro M4000 vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 581% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 145 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4000 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |