FirePro M4000 vs GRID M10 8Q
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and GRID M10 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others GRID M10 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 581% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 433 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4000 and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 41% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |