FirePro M4000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4000 has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−33
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
150−160
medium / 768p
120−130
120−130
ultra / 1080p
55−60
60−65
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−11
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
27−30
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 1% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
30−35
medium / 768p
18−20
20−22
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
3 January 2017
Pipelines
512
48
Core clock speed
600 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
55.20
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
