FirePro M4000 vs P104 100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and P104 100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against P104 100, check out specs charts below.
P104 100
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P104 100 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 1007 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 5508 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Pascal |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GP104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |