FirePro M4000 vs Quadro 2000

When choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000.

FirePro M4000 Check Price

Quadro 2000 Check Price

FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:

FirePro M4000 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4000	Quadro 2000
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	62 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000 has 87% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 2000 - in Desktops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 2000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 1900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	10−12
medium / 1080p	9−10	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	140−150	110−120
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
ultra / 1080p	55−60	35−40
QHD / 1440p	30−35	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	10−11
high / 768p	90−95	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	65−70	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 39% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	10−11
medium / 1080p	10−11	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	55−60	40−45
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	5−6	1−2
ultra / 1080p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	3−4
medium / 1080p	7−8	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro 2000.
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	4−5
medium / 1080p	10−12	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	27−30	8−9
medium / 768p	18−20	7−8
high / 1080p	10−11	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
high / 768p	35−40	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro 2000.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4000	Quadro 2000
Architecture	GCN	Fermi
Code name	Cape Verde GLM	GF106
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 July 2012	24 December 2010
Pipelines	512	192
Core clock speed	600 MHz	625 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60	20.00
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length		178 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.1
Bus support	n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	79 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Form factor	MXM-A
StereoOutput3D	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M4000 vs Quadro 2000

FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares