FirePro M4000 vs Quadro 7000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro 7000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Quadro 7000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 7000
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 518% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 51 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 1096 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 83% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 113% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GF110 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 41.66 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |