FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K2200M
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 96% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 67 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 103% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |