FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K3100M
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Quadro K3100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4000 and Quadro K3100M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Quadro K3100M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Quadro K3100M
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3100M has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3100M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 106 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 1300 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M4000 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
180−190
medium / 768p
120−130
150−160
ultra / 1080p
55−60
80−85
QHD / 1440p
30−35
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
100−105
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
80−85
medium / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 29% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
20−22
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
2−3
5−6
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
40−45
medium / 768p
18−20
24−27
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
high / 768p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Quadro K3100M
Architecture
GCN
Kepler
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
N15E-Q1-A2
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 July 2012
23 July 2013
Pipelines
512
768
Core clock speed
600 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
45.18
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
1,084 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price