Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro M4000 vs Quadro M2000

    In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro M4000 Check Price
    Quadro M2000 Check Price

    FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:

    FirePro M4000 Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro M4000 Quadro M2000
    Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 128 Bit
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M2000 has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
    • FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
    • FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
    • FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 196 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
    • FirePro M4000 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 2112 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 7−8 21−24
    ultra / 1080p 4−5 12−14
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 6−7
    4K / 2160p − 5−6
    low / 720p 18−20 40−45
    medium / 1080p 9−10 24−27
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4000.

    Full Specs

      FirePro M4000 Quadro M2000
    Architecture GCN Maxwell 2.0
    Code name Cape Verde GLM GM206
    Type Mobile workstation Workstation
    Release date 1 July 2012 8 April 2016
    Pipelines 512 768
    Core clock speed 600 MHz 796 MHz
    Boost Clock 1163 MHz
    Transistor count 1,500 million 2,940 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 21.60 55.82
    Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 1,812 gflops
    Length 201 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 6612 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 +
    CUDA 5.2
    Bus support n/a
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 79 Mh/s 215 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Form factor MXM-A
    StereoOutput3D +
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    Width 1" (2.5 cm)
    Number of simultaneous displays 4
    nView Desktop Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares