FirePro M4000 vs Quadro M4000M
When comparing FirePro M4000 and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4000 and Quadro M4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Quadro M4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 203% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 375 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
GCN
Maxwell
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
GM204
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 July 2012
2 October 2015
Pipelines
512
1,280
Core clock speed
600 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
78.00
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
2,496 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price