FirePro M4000 vs Quadro T1000
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro T1000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 51% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 795 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 3500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro T1000 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | TU117 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |