FirePro M4000 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
When comparing FirePro M4000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 21% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 330 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 3500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Architecture
GCN
Turing
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 July 2012
27 May 2019
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
600 MHz
930 / 1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 / 1620 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
103.7
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price