FirePro M4000 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
1−2
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
140−150
60−65
medium / 768p
120−130
27−30
ultra / 1080p
55−60
7−8
QHD / 1440p
30−35
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
90−95
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Qualcomm Adreno 680 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
65−70
10−11
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−11
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 720p
65−70
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
low / 768p
55−60
18−20
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
7−8
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
27−30
0−1
medium / 768p
18−20
−
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Architecture
GCN
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
6 December 2018
Pipelines
512
Core clock speed
600 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
