FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 4810
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 187% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |