FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 4830
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4830, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Radeon HD 4830, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4830
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 187% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 84% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |