FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 657% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2510 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | R700 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1990 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |