FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 766% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 24% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |