FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 51% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 130 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro M4000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 72% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |