FirePro M4000 vs Radeon RX 560X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon RX 560X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Radeon RX 560X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon RX 560X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 560X has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 560X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 575 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 2500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Dota 2 is 51% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Fortnite is 83% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Polaris 21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |