FirePro M4000 vs Radeon RX 560X mobile
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Radeon RX 560X mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4000 and Radeon RX 560X mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Radeon RX 560X mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Radeon RX 560X mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Radeon RX 560X mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 560X mobile has 96% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 560X mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 560X mobile has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 572 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 170% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
27−30
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Battlefield 5 is 193% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
140−150
230−240
medium / 768p
120−130
210−220
ultra / 1080p
55−60
130−140
QHD / 1440p
30−35
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
90−95
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 40% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
4−5
9−10
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Far Cry 5 is 172% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
130−140
medium / 1080p
27−30
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Fortnite is 125% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
75−80
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
55−60
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−105
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Metro Exodus is 242% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than FirePro M4000.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
27−30
80−85
medium / 768p
18−20
50−55
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 171% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in World of Tanks is 31% more, than FirePro M4000.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Radeon RX 560X mobile
Architecture
GCN
Polaris
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
Polaris 11
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
5 January 2017
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
600 MHz
1172 MHz
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
81.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
2,611 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
92.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price