FirePro M4000 vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 203% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 330 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 368% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 254% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 360% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 196% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 378% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |