FirePro M4000 vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 809% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 43 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FirePro M4000 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 356% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 354% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 241% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 340% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 457% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 281% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 357% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |