FirePro M4100 vs FirePro S7000
When choosing between FirePro M4100 and FirePro S7000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4100 and FirePro S7000.
FirePro S7000
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | FirePro S7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FirePro S7000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro S7000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro S7000 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 280 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 and FirePro S7000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 95−100 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 138% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | FirePro S7000 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars | Pitcairn |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 27 August 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 76.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | 272 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |