FirePro M4100 vs FireStream 9270
In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and FireStream 9270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others FireStream 9270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4100 and FireStream 9270 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9270 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4100 and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Mars | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 13 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 30.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |