FirePro M4100 vs FireStream 9370
When comparing FirePro M4100 and FireStream 9370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4100 and FireStream 9370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | FireStream 9370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 155 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 600 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4100 and FireStream 9370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | FireStream 9370 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Mars | Cypress |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 23 June 2010 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 66.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |