FirePro M4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 365 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 6000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
3−4
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
4−5
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
6−7
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
85−90
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
12−14
80−85
medium / 1080p
3−4
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
12−14
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
4−5
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
7−8
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
5−6
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
1−2
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
5−6
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro M4100.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
6−7
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
12−14
130−140
medium / 768p
9−10
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than FirePro M4100.
Full Specs
FirePro M4100
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Architecture
GCN
Turing
Code name
Mars
N18P-G62 Max-Q
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 October 2013
2 April 2020
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
670 MHz
1035 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
16.08
76.80
Floating-point performance
514.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.140
CUDA
7.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
74 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
