FirePro M4100 vs GeForce GTX 295
When comparing FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 295, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 295 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 572 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |