FirePro M4100 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 630 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 37% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 70% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 15% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4100. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4100 | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Mars | GF104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |