FirePro M4100 vs Radeon HD 4830
In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and Radeon HD 4830 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4830 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4830
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 510 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 95 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 2200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Mars | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |