FirePro M4100 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
When comparing FirePro M4100 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4100 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4100 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4100 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 or Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics - in Laptops.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 50 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics - by 32 / 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 2200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
0−1
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
3−4
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
18−20
10−11
high / 768p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
9−10
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
5−6
3−4
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
1−2
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
2−3
medium / 1080p
3−4
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
12−14
7−8
medium / 768p
9−10
6−7
high / 1080p
4−5
3−4
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
high / 768p
30−35
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
Full Specs
FirePro M4100
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Architecture
GCN
Code name
Mars
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 October 2013
1 August 2013
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
670 MHz
720 / 775 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
32 / 28 nm
Texture fill rate
16.08
Floating-point performance
514.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
74 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
