FirePro M4100 vs Radeon R9 M375X
When choosing between FirePro M4100 and Radeon R9 M375X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4100 and Radeon R9 M375X.
Radeon R9 M375X
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 255 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 2875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4100 and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 37% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 70% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 15% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |